These arguments are getting tyring…..

No matter what, a change in F1 or indeed in any sport will always evoke a negative reaction even if it is made for overwhelmingly positive reasons. If you appease some people, you aggrieve others.

The ‘F1 is a farce’ cries rumble on – with many saying they want a return to the pre-artifice days of the sport. Really?

Using DRS and Pirelli tyres, we get the overtaking and variation in winners that everyone wanted in the years of Schumacher dominance and which we got in the golden seasons like 1974 and 1983. Overtaking is done on the track and not in the pitlane. Cars pass each other.

‘But it’s artificial, it’s not real racing.’

Okay right, guys, let’s look at the alternatives:

If we revert to rock-hard tyres, do away with DRS and KERS – we’ll have ‘pure’ F1 back.

But it’ll be as boring as hell, as Paul Hembery says. One team will still be perfectly capable of exploiting the rules better than any other and creaming the field. We had rules free of trick rear wings and push to pass buttons in 1988, 1992, 1993, 1998, 2002 and 2004, to name a few, and that didn’t stop the best car being a speck on the horizon by lap 2 – there were so many processional Grands Prix you’d think the Grenadier Guards had organised them.

Okay, what can be done beyond that? 

‘Let’s have simpler aero. Give designers a box of defined dimensions and let them design a car within that box’ say the purists – well we had something similar to that in a season like 1976, when cars as diverse as the Tyrrell P34 and the Ferrari 312T2 raced against each other. Sure, they looked great, and they sure were memorable too. They’re the kind of cars that schoolboys would sketch in their jotters.  But was the racing any closer? Ferrari won five of the first six races and it was only Lauda’s accident in Germany that stopped his gallop to the title. Then look at what happened in 1978 when Colin Chapman came up with the Lotus 79 – it annihilated everything else.  

Okay –what else?

 ‘Let’s bring variation in engines back – V12s versus V8s and V10s’

Who is going to pay for that in these buttock-clenching times? And do you think having massive disparity in engines will make the racing closer?

I am sorry to say that, at this level and with these budgets, the teams will always push every single tiny advantage they can. The engineers are infinitely cleverer than the rulemakers. One or two teams will always find a way to eke out an advantage.

If you want close racing between identical chassis, there are loads of series that will satisfy your craving – Indycar, the Porsche Supercup, Caterham Sevens at Thruxton.

F1 is no longer what it was – and if you don’t like it (and we all have our own thoughts on its current state) then that’s fine. But we can’t expect it to revert back to the way it was just for us.

We all seem to forget what Formula 1 is – the gripers derisively snort ”Well, I suppose the tyres spice up Bernie’s ‘show’.”

Well of course F1 is a show! It is primarily a multi-million dollar, global television spectacle that also happens to be a sport. It is primarily entertainment – that’s why it is able to siphon the money from manufacturers and famous brands because it gives them a world stage with millions of spectators.  If it’s dull then there will be nobody to pay for it. Sorry guys – that’s the way it works. It was changed because we all asked for it.

It seems the loudest voices are those of the purists – they don’t like what they’ve got at the minute (based on one single Grand Prix, I might add) so they start to look at what they had before and convince themselves they want it back. Even it was no better or even worse. There even seems to be clamouring for refuelling to come back – the refuelling that was decried because it negated the point of qualifying and artificially created position changes by forcing teams to adopt diverse and confusing fuel strategies? Not to mention being dangerous and often skewing results because the equipment was so prone to breakages!

F1 fans at the minute sound like my baby sister when she used to get scolded for misbehaviour by my dad and would say ‘I want my mummy.’ Then, when my mum would also scold her, she would say ‘I want my daddy.’

They don’t know what they want.

The Spanish Grand Prix – with Martin Grumble

 Before Martin Brundle reached the Circuit de Catalunya yesterday morning, I assume something happened to him. His wife elbowed him in the face in her sleep, his tea was cold, he stubbed his toe getting into the shower, the vet’s bill for his cat arrived, etc.

What’s for sure is that something got up his nose good and proper because yesterday was the most bad-tempered commentary we’ve heard from the great man in a long time.

Amongst his gripes were Nico Hulkenburg driving into Jean-Eric Vergne in the pitlane (‘the throttle works both ways you know….would he have seen Vergne? If he had his eyes open, yes!)

I particularly liked his withering put-down of Lewis Hamilton’s notion that he wishes he was racing in the 1980s – the usual harking back to the days of Senna and co : ‘I’ll show him the piece of metal that used to be in my leg and see what he says.’

But the thing that most grated with him was the much-maligned Pirelli tyres and their perceived impact upon the quality of the racing.

He’s not alone. Red Bull are being particularly annoying on this front – with Dietrich Mateschitz saying the liquorice allsort tyres mean that F1 is no longer racing, and Christian Horner cancelling a media appearance last night because he was presumably so annoyed that darling Sebastian could only finish fourth.

The team wants Pirelli to change their tyres so that they last longer – essentially saying ‘hey, guys – f**k everyone else and let us exploit our car’s appetite for rubber so we can lap the entire field.’ I’ve got news for them – if you know that the tyres are going to be aggressively-constructed, then build a car that uses them properly!

The thing that galls me the most about this hand-wringing over tyres is that it just seems like more knee-jerk whinging – and after only one such race! No matter what Grand Prix racing tries to do to appease its fans, there’s always something that the forum users opine is ‘killing F1.’

Perhaps we should all sit down and watch the 2004 Bahrain Grand Prix, or in fact pretty much any of the races that year bar Monaco, and remind ourselves how lucky we are. F1 was, for so long, like a giant Scalextric race with only one slot in the track. I’m starting to think that if your average Grand Prix fan was found after being lost in the desert for ten days, he’d still be asking his rescuer if they had a nice cold beer instead of a glass of water.

Most people’s gripes seem to revolve around the fact that the drivers can’t push to the absolute limit, and this is allegedly horribly detrimental. But here’s a poser for you – without constant access to team radios and muttering team bosses, how the hell would anyone even know that the drivers were driving more carefully? It’s not like they’re going past at 42mph. Maybe I’m not as clued-in as some people, but an F1 car doing a 1m18sec lap looks pretty damned similar to me as one doing a 1m20sec lap. They still bomb past you at 180 mph plus, V8 screaming.

Have Pirelli tyres ruined F1? Of course they bloody haven’t. They have made the sport so exciting that in twenty years time we’ll look back at this era and realise how wonderful it truly was. We still have the best drivers in the best cars winning, but with just enough variation to provide us with a genuinely interesting championship narrative. What more do we want?

Why is Donington 93 so lauded?

Today marks the 20th anniversary of Ayrton Senna’s most famous win, on Easter Sunday 1993. Back in those days we still had Murray Walker and James Hunt doing the commentary and the TV pictures were in a 4:3 aspect ratio. Sega were still such a successful company in those days that they were able to sponsor both the Williams team and the race itself.

This was easily Senna’s most famous win, but was it his best?

In 1999, Autosport ran a campaign to find the race of the century. Donington won.

If this was the best race of the century, then the conclusion is that F1 fans enjoy watching a man who has already won 37 Grands Prix (including the race before in Brazil) romping off into the distance to notch up another one and making everyone else look silly, That it was a brilliant display cannot be disputed. But the greatest race of the century? What about the 1969 Italian Grand Prix or its more famous brother of two years later, where the proximity of the cars to each other was the same on the last lap as it was on the first?

Donington wasn’t really a race at all. It may be heresy to say it, but I reckon if you’d asked a lot of people what they thought of the race before the tragic events of Imola the following year elevated its status, they’d have told you they found it a bit boring. If you watch the race ‘as live’ it is no thriller, let me tell you, apart from the first five corners.

But of course it is no surprise that a Senna victory took the accolade – the automotive equivalent of Bohemian Rhapsody going to number 1 after Freddie Mercury died – but I still found the actual choice of race curious.

Senna himself always maintained that his first win in Portugal in 1985 was infinitely more satisfying. I can’t understand for the life of me why it is not the most famous of his wins. After all, his level of dominance was very similar to Donington eight years later, but this was in only his second season, and his second race in a half-decent car. Brazil 1991, where he had a McLaren stuck in sixth gear and he thought he was going to pass out every time he turned the steering wheel is to my mind infinitely more impressive as well.

Compare Senna’s screaming passion on his slowing down lap in that race compared to the cool defiance in the drizzle of Donington.

Feel free to correct me – comments welcome….

Classic Rev

Silly or Serious?

Frog on Facebook